Wells Fargo Sanctioned $3.17 Million

September 13, 2012 by

By Stephen A. Brunette*

Wells Fargo was recently sanctioned by a Bankruptcy Court with a punitive damage award in the amount of $3.17 million dollars, for egregious conduct in failing to comply with court orders to correct admitted accounting errors, and excessive litigation and appeals with a single homeowner. See In Re Jones, 2012 WL 1155715 (E.D. La. Bkrpt. 2012). Rather than summarize the opinion, the following excerpts speak for themselves.

Wells%20Fargo%20Bank%20-%20Wells%20Fargo%20Plaza%20-%2009-13-12.jpg

Wells Fargo has taken the position that every debtor in the district should be made to challenge, by separate suit, the proofs of claim or motions for relief from the automatic stay it files. It has steadfastly refused to audit its pleadings or proofs of claim for errors and has refused to voluntarily correct any errors that come to light except through threat of litigation. Although its own representatives have admitted that it routinely misapplied payments on loans and improperly charged fees, they have refused to correct past errors. They stubbornly insist on limiting any change in their conduct prospectively, even as they seek to collect on loans in other cases for amounts owed in error.
. . .

Wells Fargo has taken advantage of borrowers who rely on it to accurately apply payments and calculate the amounts owed. But perhaps more disturbing is Wells Fargo’s refusal to voluntarily correct its errors. It prefers to rely on the ignorance of borrowers or their inability to fund a challenge to its demands, rather than voluntarily relinquish gains obtained through improper accounting methods. Wells Fargo’s conduct was a breach of its contractual obligations to its borrowers. More importantly, when exposed, it revealed its true corporate character by denying any obligation to correct its past transgressions and mounting a legal assault ensure it never had to. Society requires that those in business conduct themselves with honestly and fair dealing. Thus, there is a strong societal interest in deterring such future conduct through the imposition of punitive relief.
. . .

Wells Fargo’s actions were not only highly reprehensible, but its subsequent reaction on their exposure has been less than satisfactory. There is a strong societal interest in preventing such future conduct through a punitive award. . . . [T]he Court finds that a punitive damage award of $3,171,154.00 is warranted to deter Wells Fargo from similar conduct in the future.

In Re Jones, supra at *8-10, passim.

The Gasper Law Group may be able to assist you in determining, first, whether your mortgage company, lender or loan servicer has acted in a negligent, reprehensible or an egregious manner and, second, whether you have a viable lawsuit or legal claim. Bear in mind that pursuing litigation against large, multi-national financial institutions is not for the faint of heart. We often receive calls from folks who report that their bank or loan servicer misapplied a payment, initiated foreclosure proceedings or even winterized their home while on vacation despite having a consistent payment history. If an attorney tells you that they can “get you a free house” or claims that your case is a “slam dunk,” run! Our experience in pursuing claims on behalf of homeowners spans well before it was popular.

Countless hours, months and years of research have culminated into an experience and expertise few law firms or attorneys will ever be able to provide. While we are indeed sympathetic to those who are suffering as a result of egregious banking practices, we pride ourselves on providing candid, straightforward legal advice to allow you, the client, to make important decisions on how to proceed. The reality is that not all banks are bad; in fact, banks provide a valuable resource and are in business to make money, as are most businesses. However, The Gasper Law Group remains poised and ready to pursue litigation against those financial institutions whose egregious business activities have taken priority over reasonable business practices.

Don’t call us if you think you are entitled to a new house or are entitled to free use and possession of a home you are not making payment on. Do call us if you have been seriously and adversely affected by egregious banking practices and if you want an experienced team of litigators to pursue your rights and claims.

* Stephen A. Brunette is an attorney in the Civil Division of THE GASPER LAW GROUP, PLLC located in Colorado Springs, Colorado. Contact him at (719) 227-7779 or a www.gasperlaw.com.

CIVIL LIABILITY IN GENERAL – THE TRIPOD OF CIVIL LITIGATION

September 13, 2012 by

By: Matthew B. Drexler*

THE GASPER LAW GROUP represents clients involved in or wishing to pursue a civil claim against another. Civil disputes are lawsuits or claims brought to address a private wrong such as breach of contract, negligence or intentional conduct or to enforce civil remedies such as compensation, damages or injunctions. Civil disputes are not criminal and are not brought by the government but rather by a private party or company against another private party or company.

Lawsuit%20Document%20Pic%20-%2009-13-12.jpg

Civil disputes range from business deals gone wrong, to neighbor disputes, to enforcement of contractual rights and to personal injuries. The scope of civil remedies and civil actions is extremely broad; however, all civil disputes have three universal traits that must first be analyzed when evaluating a potential claim: (1) Liability, (2) Damages and (3) Collectability (a.k.a the “Tripod of Civil Litigation”). A civil claim is viable if all three legs of the Tripod are standing.

Liability refers to who may be liable or at fault in a particular case. For example, in a motor vehicle accident, we look at who was responsible for the accident (as it turns out, liability can be apportioned or divided among several drivers or factors so an analysis of liability is a bit more complicated that it may first seem).

Damages refer to a party’s injury, loss or financial impact. For example, in a breach of contract claim, we look for whether a party has suffered an impact for the other party’s breach. In another example, we may examine the extent of a person’s injuries after a slip and fall accident.

Collectability refers to the ability of a party to collect a judgment from the other party. After all, it may not be advisable to file a lawsuit against someone who will never have the ability to pay a judgment or verdict.

The main point here is that all three elements must be satisfied. A strong liability case with significant damages may not be viable if you can’t collect in the end. The common example is an uninsured driver without assets or even the potential to ever earn significant income. The good news is that judgments issued in Colorado’s District Courts are good for 20 years and are potentially revivable after that. Depending on a client’s patience and risk tolerance, it may be worthwhile to pursue litigation.

We are often approached by potential clients who have a tremendously favorable liability case against a major, well-insured corporation (read: favorable collectability); however, the injuries are so minor that the damages do not warrant the time and expense of fully litigating a case.

Although rarer, we have encountered folks who have been severely injured yet liability was weak. This scenario can be encountered in a serious motor vehicle accident where the injured party was actually responsible for the collision. Again, this is a fact intensive inquiry and you should not draw a conclusion about liability in a civil suit without speaking to a qualified attorney.

The Tripod of Civil Litigation is fairly straightforward and appears simple to apply or analyze. However, from experience the analysis is oftentimes much more complex and can involve analyzing multiple parties, competing legal theories (e.g. negligence vs. premises liability), and multiple insurance or liability policies.

Before suit is filed and before you decide to retain THE GASPER LAW GROUP, we will analyze each leg of the tripod to determine the viability of your particular case. We provide straightforward, candid advice and present our clients with our best advice on how to proceed, if at all. We offer free consultations and will share our analysis of liability, damages and collectability; and if we don’t have enough information to immediately analyze your case, we will tell you instead of pretending we have answers and information that may not be immediately available.

* Matthew B. Drexler is a Partner & Attorney practicing in the Civil & Business Litigation Division at The Gasper Law Group, PLLC located in Colorado Springs, Colorado. Mr. Drexler can be reached at (719) 227-7779 for more information.

Continue reading "CIVIL LIABILITY IN GENERAL – THE TRIPOD OF CIVIL LITIGATION" »

Legislature May Revisit Evidentiary Issues in Foreclosure Proceedings

August 19, 2012 by

By Stephen A. Brunette
Attorney At Law
The Gasper Law Group, PLLC

Foreclosure%20with%20Gavel%20-%2008-18-12.jpg


During the 2012 Legislative Session, Rep. McCann introduced a Bill that would have repealed a section of the Colorado foreclosure statutes that allows a foreclosure to proceed without evidence of an endorsement or assignment of a homeowner’s loan to the party attempting to foreclose. Specifically, C.R.S. §38-38-101(6) provides:

(6) Indorsement or assignment. (a) Proper indorsement or assignment of an evidence of debt shall include the original indorsement or assignment or a certified copy of an indorsement or assignment recorded in the county where the property being foreclosed is located.

(b) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) of this subsection (6), the original evidence of debt or a copy thereof without proper indorsement or assignment shall be deemed to be properly indorsed or assigned if a qualified holder presents the original evidence of debt or a copy thereof to the officer together with a statement in the certification of the qualified holder or in the statement of the attorney for the qualified holder pursuant to subparagraph (II) of paragraph (b) of subsection (1) of this section that the party on whose behalf the foreclosure was commenced is the holder of the evidence of debt.

C. R. S. §38-38-101(6) (emphasis added).

Continue reading "Legislature May Revisit Evidentiary Issues in Foreclosure Proceedings" »

Drunk Diving: Civil Liability after the Criminal Charges

August 14, 2012 by

The Gasper Law Group, PLLC

On July 5, 2012 a Colorado Springs Police Department patrol supervisor was northbound on Weber St, at Boulder St, entering the intersection on a green light. A small Saturn sedan driven by an 18 year old woman was approaching the same intersection eastbound. The Saturn apparently ran the red light and collided with the patrol vehicle sending it to the Northeast corner of the intersection as it rotated on its vertical axis nearly 180 degrees. The front right passenger of the Saturn had to be extricated from the vehicle by Colorado Springs Fire Department and was being treated at a local hospital. The driver of the Saturn and the patrol sergeant suffered minor injuries. The 18 year-old driver, was arrested for traffic related charges, including Driving Under the Influence.

Motor%20Vehicle%20Accident%20-%20Accident%20Scene%20-%2006-29-11.jpg

Victims of drunk driving accidents are “victims” in the truest sense of the word. From a victim’s perspective, drunk driving accidents happen suddenly and are rarely avoidable. Even police officers driving marked patrol cars are not spared from this phenomenon. Thankfully, Colorado laws provide relief to victims that suffer injury as a result of drunk driving.

Of course, drunk drivers can be held criminally liable for their actions. The primary statute that addresses alcohol related driving offenses is Colorado Revised Statute (CRS) § 42-4-1301. In cases involving serious bodily injury, drunk drivers are also routinely charged with the felony of Vehicular Assault. Victims can rest assured that drunk drivers are punished in the criminal system through traditional means such as court ordered jail/prison, probation, alcohol classes, and community service. Victims can also recuperate certain expenses through the criminal system. CRS § 18-1.3-603 requires a drunk driver to pay “restitution” to a victim and most prosecutors make timely payment of restitution a condition of criminal probation.

Continue reading "Drunk Diving: Civil Liability after the Criminal Charges " »

Do Coloradoans Need Flood Insurance?

August 2, 2012 by

By Matthew B. Drexler
Partner and Attorney
The Gasper Law Group, PLLC

Short answer: "YES".

Homeowner, business and renter policies routinely exclude losses due to flooding or groundwater run off. This could be a significant problem for neighborhoods affected by the wildfires, or otherwise prone to flash flooding.

Intense heat causes the soil to develop a water resistant coating or layer. These are called “hydrophobic soils.” Coarse soils, like decomposed granite, are particularly prone to becoming hydrophobic. The area affected by the Waldo Canyon Fire west of Colorado Springs includes soils made up of decomposed granite; that is, Pikes Peak granite.

So, if you are downhill from the burn area flash flooding may be a problem. The city of Manitou Springs is already considering installing concrete barriers along Fountain Creek, and to reinforce drainage ditches. As the fire becomes more contained federal officials are studying how best to mitigate erosion and run off problems above the Mountain Shadows and Cedar Heights areas.

Flood insurance is only available through a federal law, the National Flood Insurance Program. Private insurers do not offer this coverage. Congress passed the statute after hurricane Betsy hit New Orleans in 1968. The insurance is administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Right now there is a 30 day waiting period once one applies for this coverage, and pays the premium. That may not help around here. The monsoon season, with periodic afternoon storms, begins in July.

There are bills in both houses of congress aimed at solving this local problem. Both Colorado Senators, Mark Udall and Michael Bennet, are co-sponsors along with several others form western states. If the law passes, the 30 day waiting period would be waived for property “subject to elevated risk of flood due to wildfire on federal land.” Senate Bill 3320, 112th Congress. The property owner must purchase the insurance promptly after the fire containment date. We do not know how pending policy applications will be handled. And we do not know whether the law will pass – it is in committee now.

Regardless, if you own property that might be at increased risk due to the wildfires, or that is otherwise in a flood prone area, consider acquiring flood insurance.

UPDATE: The law passed.

Insurance and Disaster - The Waldo Canyon Fire

August 2, 2012 by

By Matthew B. Drexler
Partner and Attorney
The Gasper Law Group, PLLC

Waldo%20Canyon%20Fire%20-%20July%202012.jpg

The Waldo Canyon Fire displaced a lot of people. Hundreds of homes were damaged or destroyed. Business was interrupted. Hopefully, insurance was in place that covered these losses.

So, what to do now that the shock of the disaster is behind you and you have to pick up the pieces?

If your home or belongings were harmed, document the things that were lost or damaged. The more detail the better. Insurance companies appreciate evidence of loss. This includes photos or video of your home and contents. But even if you do not have receipts or photographs, go ahead and make your claim. This is why you have paid premiums.

Most homeowners’ policies, and some renter policies, provide benefits for temporary living expenses. This could include not only housing but also meals and travel. For example, if an insured lived up the pass and had to commute to work in Colorado Springs through Canyon City, mileage and fuel expense would be significant. If a policy holder stayed with friends or family there will still be benefits housing. It will help if those expenses are itemized and documented.

Many business owners will have business interruption coverage. If the store had to close for several days it is often possible to document the loss by showing what revenue would have been earned. This is a case specific process because each business is unique. Again, while documentation will be important, go ahead and make the claim based on available information.
Insurance companies are prepared to deal with widespread loss, like storms and fires. The disaster adjusters are already in the area. The idea is to make the insured whole by using money to replace what was lost. That includes tangible goods, income, expenses and time. Major disputes will have to do with delay or disagreement with the values of the loss. If you feel you are being treated unfairly, the Gasper Law Group is here to help.

Proposed Initiative - Eliminate "No-Doc" Foreclosures

July 13, 2012 by

Proposed Initiative Would
Eliminate “No-Doc” Foreclosures in Colorado

By
Corrine Fowler
Stephen A. Brunette
Debra L. Fortenberry


Summary

Under current law, a foreclosing party may choose to file a Rule 120 foreclosure either: (1) with competent evidence that it is the holder of the evidence of debt, with authority to invoke the power of sale contained in the deed of trust, or, in the alternative, (2) with a certification that it is a qualified holder of the evidence of debt, or a statement by an attorney that it’s client is a qualified holder of the evidence of debt. The former is referred to herein as a “full-doc” foreclosure, the latter as a “no-doc” foreclosure.

The proposed Initiative would leave intact Colorado law that allows “full-doc” foreclosures, and would embody statutory “full-doc” foreclosure requirements in the Constitution. It would not interfere in any way with foreclosures filed by parties who have the requisite documentation for a “full-doc” foreclosure. On the other hand, the proposed Initiative would constitutionally prohibit “no-doc” foreclosures in Colorado, and repeal current statutory provisions that allow “no-doc” foreclosures. It would require parties who attempt to foreclose to “get their docs in a row” before attempting to foreclose on a Colorado homeowner.

The Business and Economic Development Committee of the Colorado House of Representatives recently passed on the opportunity to support a Bill (HB12-1156) that would have accomplished the same result. This small Committee barred full debate of this important matter on the floors of the Colorado House or Senate, however, so it is necessary and appropriate to provide Colorado voters an opportunity to act directly on this matter of statewide concern. The proposed Initiative would do just that.

1. Constitutional Bases

Article I of the Constitution of the State of Colorado is nothing more – and nothing less – than a legal description of the boundaries of the State, as follows:
Article I

The boundaries of the state of Colorado shall be as follows: Commencing on the thirty-seventh parallel of north latitude, where the twenty-fifth meridian of longitude west from Washington crosses the same; thence north, on said meridian, to the forty-first parallel of north latitude; thence along said parallel, west, to the thirty-second meridian of longitude west from Washington; thence south, on said meridian, to the thirty-seventh parallel of north latitude; thence along said thirty-seventh parallel of north latitude to the place of beginning.

Article XIV, Section 1 adopts the Counties of the Territory of Colorado as the Counties of the State of Colorado, and Article XIV, Section 8 requires each County to elect a County Clerk, who shall be the ex officio Recorder of Deeds for the County. Official records of ownership of real property within the boundaries of the State of Colorado – from Territorial Days to the present – are, accordingly, maintained in County Clerk and Recorder offices, under authority of the State Constitution.

Continue reading "Proposed Initiative - Eliminate "No-Doc" Foreclosures" »

BiTtorent Lawsuit Defendants Seek Legal Assistance

June 19, 2012 by

By Matthew B. Drexler
Partner and Attorney
The Gasper Law Group

You’ve used BiTtorent. All of a sudden, you’re “John Doe Number 33” in a lawsuit filed for copyright infringement(s) of which you may not even have been aware!” The next thing you know, a subpoena has gone out to your internet service provider asking them to give up your personal information. You are contacted directly by lawyers and/or collections agents making you aware that Federal Copyright Law may allow a court to award up to $30,000.00 or more in damages per infringement. However, they say, you can avoid such large damages and the potential embarrassment of being named in these suits by giving these agencies a nice settlement amount.

A scam that you can simply ignore? Not if you are the least bit concerned about the financial exposure that may be looming for you and your family. Fact, the following lawsuits have been filed within the last three months in the State of Colorado alone and there are likely several more to be filed:

United States District Court for the District of Colorado:

• Malibu Media, LLC v. Does 1-33, No. 1:12-cv-01394-WYD-MEH (D. Colo., filed May 30, 2012)
• Malibu Media, LLC v. Does 1-5, No. 1:12-cv-01395-REB-MEH (D. Colo., filed May 30, 2012)
• Malibu Media, LLC v. Does 1-5, No. 1:12-cv-01404-CMA-MEH (D. Colo., filed May 30, 2012)
• Malibu Media, LLC v. Does 1-5, No. 1:12-cv-01405-WJM-MEH (D. Colo., filed May 30, 2012)
• Malibu Media, LLC v. Does 1-14, No. 1:12-cv-01406-REB-MEH (D. Colo., filed May 30, 2012)
• Malibu Media, LLC v. Does 1-54, No. 1:12-cv-01407-WJM-MEH (D. Colo., filed May 30, 2012)
• Malibu Media, LLC v. Does 1-15, No. 1:12-cv-01408-REB-MEH (D. Colo., filed May 30, 2012)
• Patrick Collins, Inc. v. Does 1-10, No. 1:12-cv-01409-CMA-MEH (D. Colo., filed May 30, 2012)
• Patrick Collins, Inc. v. Does 1-12, No. 1:12-cv-01410-MSK (D. Colo., filed May 30, 2012)
• Patrick Collins, Inc. v. Does 1-10, No. 1:12-cv-01411-REB-MEH (D. Colo., filed May 30, 2012)
• Patrick Collins, Inc. v. Does 1-10, No. 1:12-cv-01411-REB-MEH (D. Colo., filed May 30, 2012)
• Raw Films, Ltd. v. Does 1-9, No. 1:12-cv-00908-MSK-MEH (D. Colo., filed Apr. 5, 2012)
• Raw Films, Ltd. v. Does 1-9, No. 1:12-cv-00909-REB-MEH (D. Colo., filed Apr. 5, 2012)
• Raw Films, Ltd. v. Does 1-7, No. 1:12-cv-00910-PAB-MEH (D. Colo., filed Apr. 5, 2012)
• Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe, No. 1:12-cv-00885-MSK-MEH (D. Colo., filed Apr. 4, 2012)
• Malibu Media, LLC v. Does 1-23, No. 1:12-cv-00836-MSK-MEH (D. Colo., filed Apr. 3, 2012)
• Malibu Media, LLC v. Does 1-10, No. 1:12-cv-00837-PAB-MEH (D. Colo., filed Apr. 3, 2012)
• Malibu Media, LLC v. Does 1-17, No. 1:12-cv-00839-PAB-MEH (D. Colo., filed Apr. 3, 2012)
• Malibu Media, LLC v. Does 1-16, No. 1:12-cv-00840-PAB-MEH (D. Colo., filed Apr. 3, 2012)
• Malibu Media, LLC v. Does 1-11, No. 1:12-cv-00843-MSK-MEH (D. Colo., filed Apr. 3, 2012)
• Malibu Media, LLC v. Does 1-6, No. 1:12-cv-00845-MSK-MEH (D. Colo., filed Apr. 3, 2012)
• Malibu Media, LLC v. Does 1-9, No. 1:12-cv-00846-WYD-MEH (D. Colo., filed Apr. 3, 2012)
• Patrick Collins, Inc. v. Does 1-12, No. 1:12-cv-00848-REB-MEH (D. Colo., filed Apr. 3, 2012)
• Patrick Collins, Inc. v. Does 1-6, No. 1:12-cv-00849-PAB-MEH (D. Colo., filed Apr. 3, 2012)
• Malibu Media, LLC v. Does 1-28, No. 1:12-cv-00834-DME-MEH (D. Colo., filed Apr. 2, 2012)
• Malibu Media, LLC v. Does 1-21, No. 1:12-cv-00835-REB-MEH (D. Colo., filed Apr. 2, 2012)
• Sunlust Pictures, LLC v. John Doe, No. 1:12-cv-00623-PAB-KMT (D. Colo., filed Mar. 12, 2012)

The truth is, if you used BiTtorrent, you may be at risk and you may already be the subject of litigation. You may be “John Doe Number 33”! Several “John Doe” defendants are seeking legal assistance from law firms that are familiar with these matters.

The Gasper Law Group is currently representing clients in these types of cases. Before you respond to any settlement demands you would be wise to contact a lawyer experienced in this specific type of litigation. The Gasper Law Group can help and is available 24/7 at (719) 227-7779.

WHAT TO LOOK FOR WHEN PURCHASING AUTO INSURANCE

July 8, 2011 by

By Heather M. Wrede
Personal Injury Paralegal
The Gasper Law Group

Motor%20Vehicle%20Accident%20-%20Accident%20Scene%20-%2006-29-11.jpg

God forbid you get into a horrible accident and it is your fault or, even worse, if you cause serious injury to another person (or yourself). An injured person can file a lawsuit against the at fault driver and not only recover insurance money but also money damages well in excess of any insurance policy. Far too many people believe this could not possibly happen to them or is statistically improbable to waste much time thinking about. However, it only takes a split second for a driver to make an error that can impact the rest of the driver’s life, whether injured or causing injury.

In a law firm, we see too many of these cases where otherwise law-abiding citizens having a stable lifestyle before the accident, experience financial ruin and miserable health. So, think twice when deciding what insurance to purchase. It is no longer a joke that consulting with an attorney prior to signing an insurance policy is a good idea. Insurance companies try very hard to make insurance look simple, affordable and worth the cost.

In today’s world of insurance, however, most people have no idea what type of coverage they carry or what they actually need. There are several key things to consider when purchasing automobile insurance. The first is the amount of liability coverage you should carry. A person who has a significant amount of assets should not only have what is referred to as full coverage but should also consider carrying and umbrella policy. The umbrella policy will cover any damages that exceed that of your regular auto policy. These policies can vary in the amount of coverage and are usually inexpensive to have. If you chose to carry only minimal coverage on your auto insurance policy, you are exposing yourself to the possibly of a lifetime of pain an suffering (health-wise and financially). Saving a few bucks today can cost your countless thousands or hundreds of thousands in the future.

Continue reading "WHAT TO LOOK FOR WHEN PURCHASING AUTO INSURANCE " »